Home

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CNN

WOLF BLITZER

Travel
CHINA
Cambodia
Thailand
Phnom Penh
Angkor Wat
Consumer Reports
Thai Police Harass
Benjamin Netanyahu

Sheldon Adelson

SPORTS
JUNIOR SEAU

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CNN'S FAKE NEWS

 

CAMBODIA NEWS Open Letter - Activist Theary Seng Speaks “Witness” vs. “Civil Party” Distinction

Theary Seng, Withdraws Her Civil Party Status and Denounces ECCC as “Irredeemable Political Farce” - NR photo

 

 

 

 

(This) past weeks' coverage of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal, whereby reporters and commentators alike refer incorrectly to victims currently testifying in the Trial Chamber as "civil parties".

 

PHNOM PENH, Cambodia - (OPCC)

Friday January 13, 2012

I would like to draw your attention to the news articles and commentaries, especially of the past weeks' coverage of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal, whereby reporters and commentators alike refer incorrectly to victims currently testifying in the Trial Chamber as "civil parties".

They are witnesses; they are not testifying in their capacity as "civil parties", a very important technical, legal distinction with consequences.

One of the consequences is the continuing exploitation and disempowerment of victims by this KRT, one of the main reasons for my withdrawal from this political farce. Repeating mindlessly the vacuity being spun by this KRT for public consumption does not help the cause of the victims.

(A “civil party” only existed in the creative, progressive mind of the drafters of the Agreement establishing the KRT, with a very painful birth during the first couple of years of its operation, followed by a state of comatose after it instituted the Lead Co-Lawyer regime which stripped a “civil party” of any real life.)

Another consequence questions the raison d’etre—quality and presence—of the inexperienced Lead Co-Lawyers (who proudly refused to meet directly with any civil party) and the platoon of 40 intermediary civil party lawyers, also inexperienced and 30 of whom are foreigners who are not based in Cambodia but at their respective home offices in Paris, California, Singapore etc., (except for the lawyers from Advocats Sans Frontiers who rotate in-out from France every 3 weeks).

Their presence obfuscates what is an already complex mixed—national-international/political-legal/ common-civil law—structure; propagates self-interestedly the legal sleight-of-hand; and assists unwittingly the propaganda of heralded, “unprecedented” civil party participation.

All to say, Cambodian victims would do well without their presence as this would peel away some layers of the confusion, complexity and deceit surrounding the KRT. The access and quality of victim participation would not change, as it is as a “witness” and not “civil party” that s/he is participating directly, currently in the KRT. Remember, Mr. Vann Nath participated as “witness” and not a “civil party; he never applied and became a “civil party”.

Up till now in Trial Chamber hearings of Case 002, there have been no victims who are heard as "civil parties" (even if they are recognized on paper as such), only victims as "witnesses".

Stated differently, a party is not a witness; a witness is not a party. And a civil party is a "party", so s/he cannot be a witness at the same time.

Description: Description: https://mail.google.com/mail/images/cleardot.gif

To call them "civil parties" is misleading and legally incorrect vis-a-vis the ongoing court proceeding. It is also disempowering the civil parties in particular and the victims in general.

© Copyright: National Radio. Any use of these materials, whole or in part, is prohibited unless authorized in writing by National Radio. Contact: nationalradio@yahoo.com All rights reserved.

 

Los Angeles Lakers
NBA MAX French language
LAKERS BUSTED
Kobe Bryant
Omri Casspi

SPORTS

THE NHL's HULLS
Colin Kaepernick

Super Bowl Pioneers

Shoehei Ohtani

Mike Piazza

FIFA Top 10

LUIS SUAREZ
FIFA News
Sepp BLATTER MATTER?

TENNIS

Williams Family

Joe Frazier

RONDA ROUSEY

TIGER WOODS